Past Events & Testimonials
SOLID TRACK RECORD
We have run well over 100 events in more than 25 countries. Over 2,000 researchers from more than 75 countries have participated in these events. Some events took place at well-known conferences, often as part of a doctoral colloquium, including ANZMAC, EBRF, EDEN/EIASM, EMAC, ISPIM, and R&D Management.
WHAT PEOPLE SAY ABOUT OUR WORKSHOPS
Great to have exercises, I enjoyed the format.
This seminar meets all my expectations. I would recommend it to all my colleagues.
I loved the participative tasks and got a lot of good tips for the future!
The contents and structure of workshop and professionalism were superb!
I gained a lot of understanding and practiced skills, therefore it was extremely valuable.
I found the workshop very useful, well organized and inspiring. Thank you!
In the beginning I felt scared to write a paper for an international journal. But now, I think it is fun to start writing.
Very insightful and useful, and intellectually engaging and stimulating.
Insider tips about a reviewer’s mindset is interesting and insightful. Also, the exercises are useful to self-review our work.
Very useful course. Good structure, short enough presentations & meaningful exercises.
Good, sharp content throughout the presentations. Good, easy-to-read material.
The workshop was inspirational! It helps and facilitates the writing process. I got useful and practical advice on how to systemize and orchestrate the writing process.
WHO ATTENDS OUR WORKSHOP
| NOVICE PHD STUDENTS having started their PhD project, they know what subject to study, but have little academic research and publishing experience. They need to be aware of and acquire the skills that will make them finish their project successfully. They are also interested in designing research projects to improve the rigor of their work, and in the basics of academic publishing. |
| ADVANCED PHD STUDENTS have already written a working paper, which is accepted at a conference and may be published in the conference proceedings. Besides training in converting their research into papers and the basics of academic publishing, they appreciate evaluation of their own writing. |
| JUNIOR FACULTY & POST-DOCS have their PhD and are moving into the next stage of their academic career, either aiming at tenure or laying the foundation for a tenure track position. The basics of academic publishing are a quick refreshment, they are keen on getting a critical evaluation of their own work and increasing their understanding of the review process. |
| SENIOR FACULTY often have tenure and a publication record of several papers in both conference proceedings and academic journals. They now aim at further improving their track record both in terms of quantity and quality. They are interested in getting personalized advice on how to improve their writing and supervision activities. |